Humanitarian Aid & The Danger of Genocide in Ethiopia
By Halie Schuster
Humanitarian aid, in the simplest terms, is assistance that is used to relieve suffering and save lives during emergencies. The underlining principal that international humanitarian aid organizations adhere to is the “golden rule” or “humanitarian imperative” being that “above all, our job is to save lives and alleviate suffering” (Concern USA, 2020). However, not all humanitarians approach the subject with the same perspective. Linda Polman discusses two major humanitarian figures in her book The Crisis Caravan: Henry Dunant and Florence Nightingale. These two have had a significant influence on the history of humanitarianism and while their associating philosophies may differ, it is important to recognize their impacts and their opinions.
Florence Nightingale, on the other hand, had a different philosophical approach to humanitarian aid. She rejected Dunant’s philosophy outright, arguing that “the higher the costs of a war, the sooner it would end” and that “voluntary efforts, which reduce the expense faced by war ministries, merely made it easier for governments to engage in wars more often and for longer” (Polman, pg. 5, 2011). Essentially, Nightingale argued that the interference of independent and neutral humanitarian aid actually enabled wars because it is more advantageous to have privatized medical relief to tend to hurt soldiers instead of governments having to provide support to them themselves. Despite her public and relatively popular rejection of Dunant’s philosophy, Dunant went on to establish the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) adopting his philosophy and which became the forerunner of all Western humanitarian aid organizations.
In The Crisis Caravan, Polman also touches on the “total ethical disaster” regarding Goma and the Rwandan genocide. Humanitarian aid efforts, particularly Red Cross efforts, failed to accurately support the victims and resolve the conflict. The main problem issue in this disaster, as Polman points out, Western media reporters and journalists insinuated that the aid being provided was benefitting victims of the corresponding cholera epidemic and turned a blind eye to the unfolding genocide. In actuality, humanitarians like Red Cross were sustaining Hutu extremists as they violently murdered Rwandan Tutsis. Polman goes on to explain that “no matter how often the Red Cross rules may be trampled underfoot by warlords, generals, rebel leaders, agitators, local chiefs, insurgents, heads of splinter groups, militia commanders, transnational terrorist leaders, regime bosses, mercenaries, freedom fighters, and national and international governments, the humanitarians persist in brandishing their Red Cross principles and accept no responsibility for the abuse of their aid” (Polman, pg. 11, 2011). The mismanaged and morally misguided humanitarian aid efforts in Goma were indeed, as Polman writes, a disaster.
References
Concern Worldwide USA, (2020, February 7). Humanitarian Aid: 5 Things You Should Know.
Concern Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.concernusa.org/story/humanitarian-aid-explained/
Gilbert, D. (2020, September 14). Hate Speech on Facebook Is Pushing Ethiopia Dangerously
Close to a Genocide. Vice. Retrieved from https://www.vice.com/en/article/xg897a/hate-speech-on-facebook-is-pushing-ethiopia-dangerously-close-to-a-genocide
Jager, T. (2020, June 29). Violence in the Wake of Musician’s Murder Indicates Risk of Atrocity
Crimes in Ethiopia. USHMM. Retrieved from https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/blog/violence-musicians-murder-risk-of-atrocity-crimes-ethiopia
Polman, Linda, et al. The Crisis Caravan: What’s Wrong with Humanitarian Aid? Picador, 2011.
Comments
Post a Comment